From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 19 08:32:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8C716A415 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 08:32:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bofh@redwerk.com) Received: from office.redwerk.com (office.redwerk.com [85.90.206.104]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F03143CA3 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 08:31:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bofh@redwerk.com) Received: from bofh by office.redwerk.com with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GwZxs-0000HX-LO for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:04:44 +0200 Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:04:44 +0200 From: Eugeny N Dzhurinsky To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061219080444.GA1006@office.redwerk.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <200612181737.39000.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> <20061218083751.T28249@turing> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061218083751.T28249@turing> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 08:32:59 -0000 On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:19:06AM -0800, Nick Johnson wrote: > It should also be run with libthr as the > threading library, as the consensus seems to be that this provides better > performance than libpthread (libkse). Very interesting. Could you please clarify how to use libthr on 5.5/6.2, will there be a need to recompile everything? -- Eugene N Dzhurinsky