Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 00:54:14 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /usr/local abuse Message-ID: <20001211005414.F89853@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200012110541.WAA33949@harmony.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 10:41:24PM -0700 References: <200012101557.KAA29588@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <14899.43958.622675.847234@guru.mired.org> <20001210120840.C38697@vger.bsdhome.com> <14899.47196.795281.662619@zircon.seattle.wa.us> <14899.49294.958909.82912@guru.mired.org> <14899.54808.947617.700838@zircon.seattle.wa.us> <14899.55273.863236.40012@zircon.seattle.wa.us> <20001210113817.D80274@dragon.nuxi.com> <14899.59134.262811.806345@zircon.seattle.wa.us> <200012110541.WAA33949@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 10:41:24PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> : To the extent that NetBSD *forces* the local administrator to use
> : /usr/pkg, I find it contains the same deficiency.
>
> I'd point out that make install in the pkgsrc tree installs into
> /usr/pkg too. So NetBSD doesn't differentiate between locally
> compiled files and binary packages they supply.
By "locally compiled" Mike and I mean softare you've downloaded (after
figureing from where), untared yourself by actually typing ``tar xzf'',
cd'ed into the extracted directory, ran `configure', and then make. Ie,
software with a little blood and sweat behind its installation.
Not the differencd between buiding a FreeBSD Port and installing a
[Satoshi-built] Package.
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001211005414.F89853>