Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:54:56 -0500 (CDT) From: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@americantv.com> To: brett@lariat.org, chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IA64: Back on topic Message-ID: <199907161754.MAA13521@free.pcs> In-Reply-To: <local.mail.freebsd-chat/19990716162507$5a6c@fish.pcs> References: <local.mail.freebsd-chat/4.2.0.58.19990716093234.047583c0@localhost> <local.mail.freebsd-chat/4.2.0.58.19990716093234.047583c0@localhost> <local.mail.freebsd-chat/19990716181736.29991@ns.int.ftf.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <local.mail.freebsd-chat/19990716162507$5a6c@fish.pcs> you write: >At 06:17 PM 7/16/99 +0200, Phil Regnauld wrote: > >> I don't know -- are you working on it ? > >I'd like to. However, I don't have the imprimatur to go to Intel and say, >"I represent FreeBSD, Inc., and would like to develop a port of FreeBSD >for Merced." Why not? You go to Intel and say: "I'm a FreeBSD developer, and would like to create a port of FreeBSD for Merced." How do you think things get done around here? Isn't ``FreeBSD Inc.'' represented by it's developers? c.f.: http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/staff.html -- Jonathan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907161754.MAA13521>