Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:50:21 +1000
From:      Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>
To:        Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD ports <ports@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: Email nagging, was: Re: Ports with version numbers goingbackwards: graphics/gd,japanese/gd, ukrain...
Message-ID:  <20041012235021.GF10363@k7.mavetju>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0410121843030.2317-100000@pancho>
References:  <B06C0FC0-1CA6-11D9-A5A5-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0410121843030.2317-100000@pancho>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:43:55PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> 
> > Uhm, I wonder why you are fine with hourly `INDEX build failed' 
> > messages, but oppose those addressing PORTVERSION. Any crucial 
> > difference I'm missing?
> 
> N ports vs M ports, N >> M.

I like solid arguments, but can you please explain what N and what
M stands for?

Edwin
-- 
Edwin Groothuis      |            Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
edwin@mavetju.org    |          Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041012235021.GF10363>