From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 24 13:25:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3C01065686 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:25:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mihamina@rktmb.org) Received: from smtp-out.orange.net (out2.laposte.net [193.251.214.119]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB5A8FC0C for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:25:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from meplus.info (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf6502.orange.lu (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 23EE7380012C for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:25:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf6502.orange.lu (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 12B07380016F for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:25:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.111] (unknown [41.190.237.66]) by mwinf6502.orange.lu (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 87734380012C for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:25:10 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20110824132510554.87734380012C@mwinf6502.orange.lu Message-ID: <4E54FBB4.7020308@rktmb.org> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:25:08 +0300 From: Mihamina Rakotomandimby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110801 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4E54D165.7090202@nagual.nl> <201108241148.p7OBmUYo003209@fire.js.berklix.net> <20110824133352.0668ce0a@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20110824133352.0668ce0a@gumby.homeunix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-me-spamlevel: not-spam Subject: Re: to come from Linux to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:25:13 -0000 On 08/24/2011 03:33 PM, RW wrote: >> > I was reading I think it wasnebsd-users@betbsd.org a few days back, >> > quite an interesting thread about para-virtualization support, >> > it seems NetBSD may have more support support there&/or with Xen. > > IIRC the Xen project itself provided host support for NetBSD because of > its portability. It allows guest OSs to run on platforms that they > don't natively support. In my particular case, I think if I must use NetBSD to virtualize a FreeBSD, it's cheaper (in time) to stick with Linux and launch a KVM with FreeBSD inside. Am I wrong? -- RMA.