From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr 28 12:06:07 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6D816A4CE
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 12:06:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [65.205.34.180])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E81D43D1F
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 12:06:07 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from vivek@khera.org)
Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103])
	by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96FCE2178B
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 15:06:06 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v613)
In-Reply-To: <200404281158.06331.ringworm@inbox.lv>
References: <AC962F6D-9940-11D8-B6E4-000A9578CFCC@khera.org>
	<200404281158.06331.ringworm@inbox.lv>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <1A15A1DC-9947-11D8-B6E4-000A9578CFCC@khera.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 15:06:06 -0400
To: ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.613)
Subject: Re: postfix port version numbering -- suggestions wanted
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 19:06:07 -0000


On Apr 28, 2004, at 2:58 PM, Michael C. Shultz wrote:

> My opinion is just as long as there is a stable postfix in 
> mail/postfix ( no
> version number ) I could care less if there are also mail/postfix1
> mail/postfix3 etc...
>

I guess I'm more looking to see if people would need a postfix20 port 
for whatever reason they have to stick to that version.