Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 21:56:18 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: yohanes@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: at91sam9g20 Message-ID: <20100601.215618.361782119982057025.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik6IhuU0_0VKN4WtClh9YY8gZoDHfQmWrlnZ4VC@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTimt7jdRO-K6uT09RwCrnvREmhy0-R8wBLtJpk32@mail.gmail.com> <20100531.221446.770914110756584248.imp@bsdimp.com> <AANLkTik6IhuU0_0VKN4WtClh9YY8gZoDHfQmWrlnZ4VC@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <AANLkTik6IhuU0_0VKN4WtClh9YY8gZoDHfQmWrlnZ4VC@mail.gmail.c= om> Yohanes Nugroho <yohanes@gmail.com> writes: : On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:14 AM, M. Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrot= e: : > : http://bsdimp.blogspot.com/2007/03/followup-atmel-at91-family-wor= k.html : > : http://marc.info/?l=3Dfreebsd-arm&m=3D123783989612142&w=3D2 : > : > Yes. =A0There's a lot of ideas, but I never had time to implement t= hem. : > The best part would be to convert the atmel port to use FDT and tha= t : > would nicely solve most of the problems. : = : I will look into the FDT, and see how much work it would be. I think it will make things a lot easier/nicer. However, I wouldn't hold up the port over it. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100601.215618.361782119982057025.imp>