From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 19 22:27:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9A516A4CE for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:27:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp4.server.rpi.edu (smtp4.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E860343D45 for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:27:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp4.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5JMQ3Od003506; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 18:26:03 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20040619175007.GB462@tuatara.fishballoon.org> References: <20040619175007.GB462@tuatara.fishballoon.org> Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 18:26:01 -0400 To: Scott Mitchell , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) Subject: Re: /bin/ls sorting bug? - change it. X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:27:18 -0000 At 6:50 PM +0100 6/19/04, Scott Mitchell wrote: > >Is this intended behaviour? If so, the documentation is wrong. >Otherwise, the attached patch produces the expected output. I >can commit it if there are no objections. Your patch looks like a reasonable change to me. By definition, there can be no one which *depends* on the present behavior in this situation, because the present behavior is not consistent. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu