From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 29 04:20:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624BE1065676 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 04:20:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chowse@charter.net) Received: from mta21.charter.net (mta21.charter.net [216.33.127.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F063E8FC15 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 04:20:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chowse@charter.net) Received: from imp09 ([10.20.200.9]) by mta21.charter.net (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20090329041955.HHPS3344.mta21.charter.net@imp09> for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 00:19:55 -0400 Received: from [192.168.254.3] ([24.176.107.216]) by imp09 with charter.net id YsKu1b00B4g9tMU05sKumv; Sun, 29 Mar 2009 00:19:55 -0400 Message-Id: <5BCD53E0-5B9F-4349-8401-FBF0ACF369C2@charter.net> From: Charles Howse To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:19:54 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) Subject: analyzing httpd-error.log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 04:20:08 -0000 Hi, I'm running 6.4-STABLE, Apache22, logwatch and Webalizer. Webalizer is doing what it's supposed to with httpd-access.log, but when I give it the error log to process is coughs, spits and spills out errors with no data processed. My research hasn't turned up a good solution for webalizer and -error.log. In httpd.conf, I'm using both common and combined log formats. Webalizer will read them both. With logwatch, and even with the log detail turned up to 7, I'm not getting the detail I want from the error.log. I want to see *everything* in that log. Anybody got a solution? -- Thanks, Charles Things that make you say, Hmmmmmm... If you were a pastor, and you were getting married, would you hire a pastor, or would you do the wedding yourself?