From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 8 13:58:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E352216A4CE for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:58:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay.rdsnet.ro (gimli.rdsnet.ro [193.231.236.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E821543D48 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:58:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: (qmail 14220 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2005 13:53:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.rdsnet.ro) (62.231.74.130) by smtp1-133.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 8 Feb 2005 13:53:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 3880 invoked by uid 89); 8 Feb 2005 14:01:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 8 Feb 2005 14:01:32 -0000 Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436B6114D3; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:58:22 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:58:22 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: v0rbiz@icon.bg Message-ID: <20050208155822.29df9373@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <4253.213.222.48.10.1107866717.squirrel@mailgw.icon.bg> References: <200502081333.08964.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <4253.213.222.48.10.1107866717.squirrel@mailgw.icon.bg> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE status X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 13:58:26 -0000 On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:45:17 +0200 (EET) "Viktor Ivanov" wrote: > On Tue, =D4=E5=E2=F0=F3=E0=F0=E8 8, 2005 14:33, Michael Nottebrock =EA=E0= =E7=E0: > > On Tuesday, 8. February 2005 13:07, Mipam wrote: > >> I saw several changes to sched_ule.c in the 5 stable branch. > >> Beneath is one of them: > >> > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2005-February/039863.html > >> > >> Is the ULE scheduler still far from stable in RELENG_5 or not? > > > > You can now compile a kernel with options SCHED_ULE again. How well it > > works > > is for yourself to determine :-) (I've been using it on my UP machine h= ere > > since yesterday only). >=20 > Hi there >=20 > I've been using only SCHED_ULE on my UP WS, even when there was #error > def. It never broke, not even once :) Though I think there's trouble > with SMP and/or HTT. I tried it once on a P4 and it paniced. >=20 > On the other hand, using SCHED_ULE improves sound quality and general > system 'response' concerning GUI... don't know 'bout performance. By any chance does it help with copying from ata disks on different controllers ? For me on large files this brings up "swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer" with 4BSD. --=20 IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"