From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 15 09:16:10 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49EF35F089 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 09:16:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from gate.utahime.jp (gate.utahime.jp [183.180.29.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B6BZc63l6z4FGS for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 09:16:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by gate.utahime.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC3512E2C5 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 18:15:59 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=utahime.org; s=maybe2019112701; t=1594804559; bh=woy7lISoBeb4w/VGSdwH3HAzUfQuahynSvBEZ/QrhuE=; h=Date:To:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:References; b=d81sTqVIInAvd1jz8O7FVyXkAnBUtAh8eKZo6/IvWJV4hgMsqg7sMIMaBoTefbIBf rWFmhkQOB0Q6nTr2uwrJvu+aC7AAkn20Si5SQgJ5ZwVkYaqrWkjE+nQ9Up3lgbCECX UL8/DlGnTDgC1xgd1Qymj1kg9ne6jcHKFZDciHBZDkYBhKsY748kbVXK9lpHwMtIjQ rUGWPFnbaKRmdVOO9BmBph+spfHoXjA67rQ5Fp7fafm13bzE1xnNX57TZCJRwOc3ER GKmV7gpkQhhS9UbP68OdZdVo1LGLLSc5WVOCVYxMaee6mB4OgqiWUo2jQqI5+2lif9 +TsJYH4dxGm/A== Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 98B74461F3; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 18:15:57 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.3 at eastasia.home.utahime.org Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 18:15:22 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20200715.181522.1967527199787387239.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: clang versions From: Yasuhiro KIMURA In-Reply-To: <20200715090750.5204F40605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net> References: <20200715090750.5204F40605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4B6BZc63l6z4FGS X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=utahime.org header.s=maybe2019112701 header.b=d81sTqVI; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yasu@utahime.org designates 183.180.29.210 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yasu@utahime.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.45 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[utahime.org:s=maybe2019112701]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.06)[-1.057]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.02)[-1.019]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utahime.org]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:spf-authorized.utahime.org]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[utahime.org:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.37)[-0.372]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2519, ipnet:183.180.0.0/16, country:JP]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 09:16:10 -0000 From: Hal Murray Subject: clang versions Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 02:07:50 -0700 > > I've got an 11.4 system with clang 10.0.0 > I've got several 12.1-RELEASE-p6 systems with clang 8.0.1 > > I'd expect the newer releases to have newer (or at least the same) versions of > clang. > > Yet the full version info says: > > FreeBSD clang version 8.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_801/final 366581) (based on LLVM 8.0.1) > Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd12.1 > Thread model: posix > InstalledDir: /usr/bin > > The Target line makes me think this is what was intended. > > Can somebody confirm that this apparent reversal of the version numbers is expected? If not, how do I fix it? (I may have fatfingered something when driving freebsd-update.) > > If this is expected, is there a good story? It is because 11.4 is released later than 12.1. See https://www.freebsd.org/releases/ for more information. --- Yasuhiro KIMURA