From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Fri Sep 14 09:01:51 2018
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25DA310A8489
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Fri, 14 Sep 2018 09:01:51 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from igorr@pochta-mx.canmos.ru)
Received: from pochta-mx.canmos.ru (pochta-mx.canmos.ru [89.107.127.240])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2BBB7A0E2
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 09:01:50 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from igorr@pochta-mx.canmos.ru)
Received: from pochta-mx.canmos.ru (pochta-mx.canmos.ru [89.107.127.240])
 by pochta-mx.canmos.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99F22DBBBD2;
 Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:02:37 +0300 (MSK)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2-pochta_20120910 (2011-06-06) on
 pochta.canmos.ru
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
 version=3.3.2-pochta_20120910
Received: from pochta-mx.canmos.ru (pochta-mx.canmos.ru [89.107.127.240])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by pochta-mx.canmos.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPS;
 Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:02:37 +0300 (MSK)
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:02:37 +0300 (MSK)
From: "Igor V. Ruzanov" <igorr@pochta-mx.canmos.ru>
X-X-Sender: igorr@pochta.canmos.ru
To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Alexandre_C=2E_Guimar=E3es?=
 <lebarondemerde@privacychain.ch>
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Solaris Doors IPC Implementation
In-Reply-To: <20180913210646.vgbaoyornms6xplc@privacychain.ch>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1809141158270.36483@pochta.canmos.ru>
References: <20180913210646.vgbaoyornms6xplc@privacychain.ch>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
X-GPG-PUBLIC-KEY: 1024D/F433BDD5 2009-06-17 Igor V. Ruzanov
 <igorr@hosting.canmos.ru>
X-GPG-FINGERPRINT: 5030 C793 4238 FAFF 827F  0E99 FDCE 63DD F433 BDD5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.27
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 09:01:51 -0000

On Thu, 13 Sep 2018, Alexandre C. Guimarães wrote:

|Hi.
|
|Reading the FreeBSD IdeasPage I see the desire to have the 'Solaris Doors IPC'
|implemented on FreeBSD.
|
|Due to curiosity, what are the advantages of the Solaris IPC over Mach? I mean
|Mach was already implement in NextBSD.

These are different implementations. Mach ports use asynchronous 
communication model while the Solaris DOORS are being synchronous. There 
are different applications for these IPC models 


|Thanks.
|
|-- 
|Best regards./lebarondemerde
|_______________________________________________
|freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
|https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
|To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
|