From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 21 05:00:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5129216A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 05:00:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CC143D41 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 05:00:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [192.168.214.215] (c-24-1-210-118.client.comcast.net[24.1.210.118]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2005022105001201300qe12ie>; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 05:00:12 +0000 Message-ID: <42196AF5.9030302@computer.org> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 23:00:37 -0600 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050127) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------050200030201020006080903" Subject: Trouble with upgrading ports... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 05:00:13 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050200030201020006080903 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, I am having difficulty upgrading ports on all my freebsd 5.3-stable machines. They all have been cvsup'd and built within the last few days. But for the last week, maybe two... something strange has been (not) happening. Portversion no longer correctly reports what ports need updating. But if I do a 'portupgrade -arR', the appropriate things get upgraded.... and then later it says they 'succeed' the port!?! It feels like the INDEX is not getting update at all, or something. I have a script (attached) to update my system sources. I then portupgrade, or buildworld whenever I feel like it. It has ben working fine for quite sometime. Maybe the script is bad and I was bound to mess my machines up. Not sure. Either way... If I delete my INDEX and then 'make fetchindex'... things don't resolve themselves. I'm really not sure where the problem is. I was hoping someone could point me in the right direction. Below is an example of the behavior I am seeing. This is happening on three machines (all using the same scripts... and me). fangorn# cd /usr/ports fangorn# rm INDEX-5 fangorn# rm INDEX.db fangorn# make fetchindex INDEX-5.bz2 100% of 614 kB 366 kBps fangorn# portsdb -u [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 12376 port entries found .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000.........6000.........7000.........8000.........9000.........10000.........11000.........12000... ..... done] fangorn# portversion -v -L "=" ImageMagick-6.1.9.4 > succeeds port (port has 6.1.9.2) bitstream-vera-1.10_1 > succeeds port (port has 1.10) docbook-xsl-1.68.1 > succeeds port (port has 1.68.0) dri-6.2.1,2 > succeeds port (port has 6.2_2,2) emacs-21.3_4 > succeeds port (port has 21.3_3) gnutls-1.0.24_1 > succeeds port (port has 1.0.24) libfpx-1.2.0.11 > succeeds port (port has 1.2.0.9_1) fangorn# portupgrade -narR ---> Session started at: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:25:46 -0600 ** No need to upgrade 'dagrab-0.3.5_1' (>= dagrab-0.3.5_1). (specify -f to force) ** No need to upgrade 'gkrellm-2.2.4_1' (>= gkrellm-2.2.4_1). (specify -f to force) ---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) - audio/dagrab (dagrab-0.3.5_1) - textproc/xmlcatmgr (xmlcatmgr-2.2) - graphics/imlib2 (imlib2-1.1.2_1) + devel/libast (libast-0.5_1) <--- This DOES need upgrade - textproc/jade (jade-1.2.1_9) - www/firefox (firefox-1.0_7,1) - x11-wm/fluxconf (fluxconf-0.9.7_1) - sysutils/gkrellm2 (gkrellm-2.2.4_1) ---> Packages processed: 1 done, 168 ignored, 0 skipped and 0 failed ---> Session ended at: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:26:18 -0600 (consumed 00:00:32) fangorn# exit Everything that portversion reports as suceeding the ports, DOES. But it shouldn't since the script updates the ports and THEN upgrades those installed. Portupgrade correctly realizes that devel/libast requires an upgrade... portversion does not. I've looked in the past posts, handbook, man pages, UPDATING, various READMEs.... but really not sure what I'm looking for at this point. Thanks in advance. -- Regards, Eric --------------050200030201020006080903 Content-Type: text/plain; name="update-src" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="update-src" #!/bin/sh # Get all new source! echo echo "------------------------------------------------" echo "Grabbing source, docs, and ports..." echo "------------------------------------------------" cvsup -g -L 1 /root/update/my-supfile echo echo "------------------------------------------------" echo "Updating documentation..." echo "------------------------------------------------" cd /usr/doc export DOC_LANG=en_US.ISO8859-1 echo "Output to /dev/null..." make install > /dev/null echo "Done with docs." echo echo "------------------------------------------------" echo "Updating ports index..." echo "------------------------------------------------" cd /usr/ports make fetchindex portsdb -u echo echo "------------------------------------------------" echo "Checking package registry..." echo "------------------------------------------------" pkgdb -F echo echo "------------------------------------------------" echo "Cleaning port distfiles..." echo "------------------------------------------------" portsclean -CDD echo echo "------------------------------------------------" echo "Fetching distfiles for ports..." echo "------------------------------------------------" portupgrade -aFR echo echo "------------------------------------------------" echo "Take note of the following ports..." echo "------------------------------------------------" portversion -v -L "=" echo echo "------------------------------------------------" echo "Feel free to build world or update your ports!" echo "Finished at `/bin/date`." echo "------------------------------------------------" echo --------------050200030201020006080903--