Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 09:47:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_resource.c Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10405090939170.9001-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0405082206130.95616-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 8 May 2004, Julian Elischer wrote: > yes, but the posix priority stuff all affects the entire process > so we are diverging from that. Right, my only point is that it is OK to diverge from that since rtprio() is not part of the standard and any application that uses it should not expect POSIX conformance WRT process priority and scheduling. -- Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10405090939170.9001-100000>