Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 09:20:57 -0500 From: Glenn Johnson <glennpj@charter.net> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: gdk-pixbuf has indirect gettext dependency Message-ID: <20030831142057.GA921@gforce.johnson.home> In-Reply-To: <1062311821.20426.31.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <20030830193903.H25519@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <1062311821.20426.31.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 02:37:01AM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 22:43, Doug Barton wrote: > > > Howdy, > > > > I was doing the gettext dance on one of my systems today, and > > discovered that gdk-pixbuf has an indirect dependency on gettext, > > seemingly inherited through gtk. So the following procedure: > > > > install a bunch of stuff gettext is updated, and bumps .so version > > number uninstall gettext, glib, gtk reinstall above try to run any > > app linked with gdk-pixbuf *BOOM* > > This is why I recommended people do a portupgrade -rf -m BATCH=yes > gettext so that they can get to all the ports with implicit > dependencies on gettext. Just a note, I did the 'portupgrade -rf -m BATCH=yes gettext' job yesterday (took almost all day). Anyway, the '-m BATCH=yes' part did not work. I still got the (annoying) confirmation screen for gdm2. Of course I realized this when I got back to the machine after being out for a while. -- Glenn Johnson glennpj@charter.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030831142057.GA921>