Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 23 Jun 2017 07:23:34 +0200
From:      Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ports <ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version
Message-ID:  <20170623052334.GC29157@home.opsec.eu>
In-Reply-To: <856b02db-26b2-91c5-acc6-f62fc99af49e@freebsd.org>
References:  <CAO%2BPfDeFz1JeSwU3f21Waz3nT2LTSDAvD%2B8MSPRCzgM_0pKGnA@mail.gmail.com> <20170622121856.haikphjpvr6ofxn3@ivaldir.net> <dahnkctsm1elbaqlarl8b9euouaplqk2tv@4ax.com> <20170622141644.yadxdubynuhzygcy@ivaldir.net> <4jrnkcpurfmojfdnglqg5f97sohcuv56sv@4ax.com> <20170622211126.GA6878@lonesome.com> <n8eokc5fafda8gedtvbhh7i0qdk83gur5q@4ax.com> <20170623023954.GA29157@home.opsec.eu> <856b02db-26b2-91c5-acc6-f62fc99af49e@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi!

> > There's a blog post from one of the folks that explains the
> > idea behind that 'fast update' mode of operations, and yes,
> > he's doing real work.

> > http://blog.koehntopp.info/index.php/1776-rolling-out-patches-and-changes-often-and-fast/

> That is ONE kind of installation.

Well, there's the thinking that in the not-to-far future, everything
is connected, and you'll need to be able to update at any time
because of whatever security/threat that IT ecosystem throws at you.

> It DOES NOT WORK when th most you can upgrade a customer system is 
> once a year or once every two years.

The 'other side' of the debate thinks: Well, if they think this
is the way to do it, they have a problem and need to change
their procedures.

The viewpoint is: That system can start debating with the next
worm/trojan coming along, but that won't help. The assumption
is: everything is connected/on the internet, and not even
voluntarily.

Think connected cars, IoT etc.

> I will add that such users would help their own case by fixing such 
> issues and feeding the changes back to their branches upstream,
> thus helping maintain the branch. Maybe we could have a system of 
> "corporate sponsors" for these branches.

Given the state of fundraising in open source, I doubt that this
will be viable.

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         3 years to go !



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170623052334.GC29157>