Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 5 Dec 2008 04:38:41 -0500
From:      Brad <brad@comstyle.com>
To:        Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: bgp, is-is, ...
Message-ID:  <200812050438.42163.brad@comstyle.com>
In-Reply-To: <4938F449.3000401@psg.com>
References:  <4938E9BD.3040607@psg.com> <200812050422.44586.brad@comstyle.com> <4938F449.3000401@psg.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 05 December 2008 04:28:41 Randy Bush wrote:
> but no is-is?  not to start an emacs/vi debate, but most of us old
> pharts are is-is, as are the big old backbones (and the smarter new
> ones:-).

Not yet. You're welcome to help start an isisd. ;)

So far BGP, OSPF, RIP and DVMRP working. OSPF6d started.

> >> for two full bgp feeds, is 4g of ram gonna last? or should i get 8g?
> >
> > A machine with 512MB of memory should have no problem with 3 maybe 4
> > feeds depending on BGP implementation and setup. So 2GB should be more
> > than enough
>
> cool.  this will have at least two ibgp peers who have full external
> transit feeds, i.e. 200k prefixes each.

Ya, with how cheap memory is for anything you will most likely use there
is no point not having at least 1GB and that will provide more than enough
memory to work with.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200812050438.42163.brad>