Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 13 Apr 2018 10:35:11 -0300
From:      Joseph Mingrone <jrm@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Matthias Fechner <idefix@fechner.net>
Cc:        Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@freebsd.org>, Torsten Zuehlsdorff <freebsd@toco-domains.de>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r467193 - in head/www/gitlab: . files
Message-ID:  <86o9inrzzk.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca>
In-Reply-To: <b14f8ea5-5d26-6ea0-c175-558a8fef2504@toco-domains.de> (Torsten Zuehlsdorff's message of "Fri, 13 Apr 2018 12:10:20 %2B0200")
References:  <201804121833.w3CIXtgW077267@repo.freebsd.org> <e1a55c7b-1ad1-36c8-ec3d-f806702feed5@fechner.net> <CAMHz58RD9rtyqBLV6nsZ2naOvGRiO7PDPAGWZ8Vemnz-g1J6cw@mail.gmail.com> <431aaec9-51c2-c0c9-7a1f-2f29f79edb5d@fechner.net> <20180413100736.GA32041@FreeBSD.org> <b14f8ea5-5d26-6ea0-c175-558a8fef2504@toco-domains.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Matthias Fechner <idefix@fechner.net> writes:
> Dear sunpoet,

> Am 12.04.2018 um 20:33 schrieb Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh:
>> Log:
>>   Fix Gemfile for rubygem-default_value_for 3.1.0 update

>>   - Bump PORTREVISION for package change

>> Modified:
>>   head/www/gitlab/Makefile
>>   head/www/gitlab/files/patch-Gemfile
> I really enjoy your work and it is totally fine for me, if you upgrade a
> gem that you copy the old one and make sure that gitlab uses the old.
> (like you did with r467106, thanks a lot for this!)

> But please do not start to patch the Gemfile!
> This will break gitlab. Have you tested gitlab with this modification?
> (for sure not, I reported exactly that version of default_value_for
> upstream and they rolled back the change as it broke gitlab, they broke
> 3.0.4 and rolled back the modification with 3.0.5, now you changed
> gitlab to use the version that for sure will not work!)

> Please revert this modification and ask me (the maintainer) before you
> start to modify the port I maintain.
> Thanks a lot that you understand this.

> Gru=C3=9F
> Matthias

I relate.  Sunpoet, I also appreciate your work, but this type of
breakage can be frustrating.  We need to figure out a solution.

> On 13.04.2018 12:07, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>> I don't quite understand how/why would anyone in their right mind write
>> software than breaks when one of its dependencies have *minor* version
>> bump?  Is this specific to Gitlab, or the nature of Gemfiles is really
>> that broken?

This practice seems to be more common and in the extreme case, exact
versions of all components are specified.  A few examples that come to
mind other than Ruby Gems (with Bundler) are node and Haskell's stack.

To match what upstream is requesting, I have wondered if the ability to
specify maximum versions would be useful.

RUN_DEPENDS=3D
rubygem-default_value_for>=3D3.0.1<3.1:devel/rubygem-default_value_for

The added complexity is probably not worth it for the ability to run
this sort of test.

devel/rubygem-default_value_for % check_update_breaks_something
*** DANGER, DANGER *** www/gitlab requires devel/rubygem-default_value_for =
< 3.1 !

A less drastic approach would be to add PORTSCOUT entries to prevent
premature Gem port updates.  In this case

PORTSCOUT=3D  limit:^3\.0

in devel/rubygem-default_value_for/Makefile

Could this work for everyone?

J.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=4SkM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86o9inrzzk.fsf>