Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:10:15 +0200 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> To: Eirik Oeverby <ltning@anduin.net> Cc: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mail selection options in sysinstall(8). Message-ID: <20030919121014.GD386@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030919133900.451a3f5d.ltning@anduin.net> References: <20030918152942.5c7163df.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030918234442.51921f77.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> <20030918221319.GD1558@FreeBSD.org> <20030919133900.451a3f5d.ltning@anduin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--xo44VMWPx7vlQ2+2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2003.09.19 13:39:00 +0200, Eirik Oeverby wrote: > On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 00:13:20 +0200 > "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > > Sounds like a good idea. Postfix and Exim were mainly chosen because > > we knew them, but the code was written with the intention to support > > more MTA's. >=20 > Great. The obvious choice would be qmail. Not sure if that one > integrates/replaces sendmail cleanly though.=20 As mentioned by Tom's original mail that isn't possible due to the qmail license. You can go bug djb about it :-) (though I doubt it will change anything). Note, the license is the reason why qmail isn't included, it's not a crusade against qmail - I also use qmail myself some places. --=20 Simon L. Nielsen FreeBSD Documentation Team --xo44VMWPx7vlQ2+2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/avImh9pcDSc1mlERAv0zAJ4o3pShm1X4iwpsssAhj32jvYNYAgCeOm3z NpfKDf495qpv1/Ywi1v8QWY= =S4xB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xo44VMWPx7vlQ2+2--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030919121014.GD386>