From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 2 23:28:31 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4371DEAFA; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 23:28:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47pkk656Vrz47sN; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 23:28:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1in9t5-0002af-Oz; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 00:28:19 +0100 Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 00:28:19 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Michael Grimm Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Subject: Re: replacement of security/ipsec-tools Message-ID: <20200102232819.GB5825@home.opsec.eu> References: <50378AC0-0A0A-4E33-961F-3D180987A8C1@ellael.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50378AC0-0A0A-4E33-961F-3D180987A8C1@ellael.org> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47pkk656Vrz47sN X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.87 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.89)[-0.892,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.983,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 23:28:31 -0000 Hi! > What would be a secure alternative if one is needed? > #) security/racoon2 > #) security/strongswan This is also ipsec based. > #) something else? openvpn or wireguard -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ?