From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Oct 23 22:18:16 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id WAA09412 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 23 Oct 1995 22:18:16 -0700 Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA09385 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 1995 22:17:59 -0700 Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.50]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id WAA05260; Mon, 23 Oct 1995 22:17:55 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id WAA00371; Mon, 23 Oct 1995 22:16:08 -0700 Message-Id: <199510240516.WAA00371@corbin.Root.COM> To: ache@freefall.freebsd.org cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ld.so, LD_NOSTD_PATH, and suid/sgid programs In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 24 Oct 95 07:48:58 +0300." From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 22:16:08 -0700 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >>I don't think you're 'script' is at all convincing, at least not to me. >>In any case it appears the consensus is to remove this feature from use, >>which I also agree would be a good thing. > >I vote for complete removing LD_NOSTD_PATH too. Well then, we are in complete unanimous agreement on this issue. John P. has already indicated that he'll be removing it from ld.so. -DG