From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jan 6 19:51:36 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA02835 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 6 Jan 1998 19:51:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from iworks.InterWorks.org (deischen@iworks.interworks.org [128.255.18.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA02446 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 1998 19:46:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org) Received: (from deischen@localhost) by iworks.InterWorks.org (8.7.5/) id VAA23795; Tue, 6 Jan 1998 21:49:59 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <199801070349.VAA23795@iworks.InterWorks.org> Date: Tue, 6 Jan 1998 21:49:59 -0600 (CST) From: "Daniel M. Eischen" To: dap@damon.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, nate@mt.sri.com Subject: Re: Motif question Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > The jdk115 port uses lesstif-0.81. [...] > Is there any chance of the diffs being released anytime soon, so that > those of us with Motif can create their own binary releases w/out these > annoying bugs? (Replacing the LessTif shlib with the Motif version > causes SEGV's, which is what I believe the rest of the article is > about.) Yes, please :-) We have several Motif licenses, as I'm sure many others do too. Is it possible to build the binary version against Motif and omit the troublesome library(ies) containing the Motif library routines? And then a simple way to rebuild the libraries with our own Motif without having to rebuild jdk? Or is this wishful thinking ;-) Dan Eischen deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org