Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 23:58:35 -0800 From: Darren Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com> To: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2) Message-ID: <545C7BAB.1050702@bluerosetech.com> In-Reply-To: <CAOjFWZ7Ck_8nQ7BxtZNNNJUC8_pVW%2BpMojoVzZhKnhsXSHsb8Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <201411060924.sA69OiJp074172@mech-as221.men.bris.ac.uk> <1415334367.3352.188112021.3470E273@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAOjFWZ7Ck_8nQ7BxtZNNNJUC8_pVW%2BpMojoVzZhKnhsXSHsb8Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/6/2014 8:35 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: > I know there was talk about it in the recent past, but has the "export the > svn revision of the ports tree used to build packages" feature been added > to the repo metadata? That would eliminate a lot of the issues associated > with mixing ports and packages, as one could use the same ports tree > locally as was used to build official packages. Seconded. Please, PLEASE implement this. It would mean that I could run poudrerie off the same ports tree as the public repo and overlay customized packages without worrying about dependency version conflicts.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?545C7BAB.1050702>