Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 15:00:07 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports subtree dependencies checking Message-ID: <20040518220007.GA35570@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040518152749.M52881@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <20040518152749.M52881@woozle.rinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 03:45:15PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > Dear colleagues, >=20 > as all of you knows, keeping up to date thw whole ports tree involves > tremendous number of disk operation per cvs/cvsup. So, I use small script= to > keep up-to date rather small set of ports (less than 1000, comparing to 1= 0k+ > total ports in the tree). >=20 > Sometimes this leads to broken dependencies (e.g., when tracked port beco= mes > dependent on some new port, or when dependency port moves). The latter ca= se > partially can be covered by tracking MOVED file, the former can not. >=20 > Previously, `make index' would complaint about missing dependencies, so t= hese > ports can be caught. Now, with INDEX_JOBS parallel index building, these = errors > are hidden in the process. They should not be. Please provide evidence. Kris --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAqodnWry0BWjoQKURAqiyAKD0sYVPPOpNfdq5LvtfFzMPq/2UwACeOr89 ldiNv4hgrTnTVmZXgP8HDWI= =59XJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040518220007.GA35570>