Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:24:19 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey <kdk@daleco.biz> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr Subject: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not... Message-ID: <420D5AC3.3000202@daleco.biz> In-Reply-To: <1935025570.20050211232605@wanadoo.fr> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1050211122632.99069G-100000@fledge.watson.org> <1108126229.4084.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> <2fd864e05021106537bdcff09@mail.gmail.com> <1108146951.31338.10.camel@hatter.wonderland.dn> <1935025570.20050211232605@wanadoo.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Anthony Atkielski wrote: >Screenshots say _absolutely nothing_ about what an OS can do as a >server. And FreeBSD is not any more suitable for the desktop than Linux >(which is to say, it's hardly usable at all). > > Now, I've deleted all the context, but that's quite a generalization there in that second sentence. IIRC, this was the sort of thing that caused a few people to killfile your address a couple years back. Which was sad, because you bring a few plusses and a viable P.O.V. to the discussions that we all watch and/or participate in. I'm not trying to chastise nor start an argument; but you may want to be careful that in burning the thatch from the yard, you don't catch the forest on fire. Respectfully, Kevin Kinsey
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?420D5AC3.3000202>