Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 25 Apr 2013 06:43:32 +0100
From:      Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD-update?
Message-ID:  <20130425064332.4f15a20a6a46dade5aa9a0e4@sohara.org>
In-Reply-To: <5178A647.4030302@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
References:  <201304242307.r3ON7AEg039368@chilled.skew.org> <201304242232170093.02EE4C98@sentry.24cl.com> <20130425044744.3ebda15f.freebsd@edvax.de> <201304242332000938.0324FC0A@sentry.24cl.com> <5178A647.4030302@herveybayaustralia.com.au>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:43:03 +1000
Da Rock <freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote:

> Interesting. My only observation was that sysctl is supposed to be the 
> 'system' database where all queries relate to. It is supposed to display 
> everything about the system; therefore any of these data bits should be 
> fixed here first. Anything else would be a 'feature' :)

	That would be nice - one way to achieve that would be to add a
writable oid for patch level and not bump newvers.sh for patches.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130425064332.4f15a20a6a46dade5aa9a0e4>