Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 23:17:23 -0400 From: jhell <jhell@DataIX.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what next for the pkg_install rewrite Message-ID: <4C6DF3C3.2070102@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <20100819214516.GD15775@graf.pompo.net> References: <20100819143830.GJ35140@azathoth.lan> <AANLkTimY=FJas-oXkWwO07QtaD%2BGrLockgJ_SZQJ7UHM@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimhh2vOtXUb-frzWcZmANWyEC7oPtTgepzvOtSB@mail.gmail.com> <4C6DA0FA.7080203@DataIX.net> <20100819214516.GD15775@graf.pompo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/19/2010 17:45, Thierry Thomas wrote: > Le Jeu 19 aoû 10 à 23:24:10 +0200, jhell <jhell@DataIX.net> > écrivait : > >> As well I would also like to see something done about packages that >> don't need to be upgraded because they are neither platform or arch >> dependent but yet they are upgraded due to being listed as a dependent >> of another port that needs to be upgraded. For example any package that >> may be type shell script does not need updating due to a major lib >> version bump of for say libpng. > > For this purpose, it's already possible to check if the port set > NO_BUILD. > > Regards, Ah then to my understanding, port/pkg upgrade tools do not have any way currently implemented that checks for this to skip those or PORT_REVISION bumps are being made on those at the time a shlib major version bump happens or both. Thanks for your reply. -- jhell,v
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C6DF3C3.2070102>