Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2018 15:03:08 +0200 From: Niclas Zeising <zeising@freebsd.org> To: Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3a_Dependencies_=e2=80=93_drm-kmod=2c_drm-stable-kmod_?= =?UTF-8?Q?and_drm-next-kmod?= Message-ID: <eb55b68a-d728-3633-ee80-6e8b88054dd0@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <b7e0571c-c233-e4d6-7a2e-86adc49b4600@gmail.com> References: <b7e0571c-c233-e4d6-7a2e-86adc49b4600@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/7/18 7:17 AM, Graham Perrin wrote: > According to <https://www.freshports.org/graphics/drm-kmod/#requiredtor= un>: >=20 > - for drm-kmod, drm-stable-kmod is the sole runtime dependency. >=20 > Below, I see -next- (not -stable-): >=20 > $ pkg rquery %dn graphics/drm-kmod > drm-next-kmod > drm-next-kmod > $ >=20 > =E2=80=93 is that contrary to what's at FreshPorts? (Do I misunderstand= something?) >=20 > ---- >=20 > More: >=20 > $ pkg rquery %rn graphics/drm-kmod > $ >=20 > $ pkg rquery %dn graphics/drm-stable-kmod > gpu-firmware-kmod > gpu-firmware-kmod > $ pkg rquery %rn graphics/drm-stable-kmod > $ >=20 > $ pkg rquery %dn graphics/drm-next-kmod > gpu-firmware-kmod > gpu-firmware-kmod > $ pkg rquery %rn graphics/drm-next-kmod > drm-kmod > drm-kmod > $ >=20 > =E2=80=93 is there _truly_ intended to be some dependency between drm-n= ext-kmod and drm-kmod? Hi! The version of drm-*-kmod that's pulled in is dependent on your FreeBSD=20 version. The dependenvy shown on FreshPorts is probably based on the=20 version of FreeBSD FreshPorts is using to parse the ports tree. gpu-firmware-kmod is a dependency of all drm-*-kmod ports, but it's not=20 a direct dependency of drm-kmod. Regards --=20 Niclas Zeising
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?eb55b68a-d728-3633-ee80-6e8b88054dd0>