Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:45:01 +0100 From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Jan Beich <jbeich@tormail.net>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>, Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org>, cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net-p2p/amule Makefile ports/net-p2p/amule/files patch-configure Message-ID: <4EF9858D.9000607@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20111226060601.GA68567@FreeBSD.org> References: <201112251903.pBPJ39SJ037714@repoman.freebsd.org> <1Reu5F-000KFr-GV@internal.tormail.net> <CADLo838hfAz-bwhxvNLbN4yDRhMXwEHdAzSjBMjUx0GczSmDrA@mail.gmail.com> <20111226060601.GA68567@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexey Dokuchaev ha scritto: >> It's not... but there's no need to specify LICENSE_FILE for a known licence. > > Right, so perhaps this line should be dropped completely, not just commented > out. On a related note, thanks for removing LICENSE_FILE knobs for known > standard licenses, we need to cure this abuse for quite a while. Well, actually the license framework documentation says exactly the opposite, it recommends to set LICENSE_FILE also for known licenses. -- Alex Dupre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EF9858D.9000607>