Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:24:40 -0400 From: jhell <jhell@DataIX.net> To: Graham Todd <gtodd@bellanet.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS v28 is ready for wider testing. Message-ID: <4C8AA218.8090104@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <4C878B9A.2000909@bellanet.org> References: <20100831215915.GE1932@garage.freebsd.pl> <20100902214823.GB2542@garage.freebsd.pl> <4C811954.5040602@3mail4.co.uk> <20100903170241.GF1780@garage.freebsd.pl> <4C8232C6.9020108@DataIX.net> <4C8294B7.3010507@bellanet.org> <20100908090842.GA87388@roberto-al.eurocontrol.fr> <4C878B9A.2000909@bellanet.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/08/2010 09:11, Graham Todd wrote: > On 09/08/10 05:08, Ollivier Robert wrote: >> According to Graham Todd: >>> Thanks to you and other devs for all your careful work integrating ZFS >>> into FreeBSD. It seems amazing that the patch for v28 *almost* even >>> applies to 8-STABLE. >> >> Do you think you could generate a 8-STABLE patch or at least tell us where >> it is failling please? > > thanks to jhell,v - who has already has attempted this and reported back :) :-) > > see: http://bit.ly/d20tML and > > lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2010-September/019576.html > > "only 14 of the 293 files that were changed had rejects against a stable/8 > that was patched to ZFSv15 + metaslab_v2 + abe_stat_rrwlock" > > I was unable to quite that far - I think because I applied the earlier > patches in the wrong order. But I am impressed that adding a patch from > CURRENT to go from ZFSv15 to ZFSv28 on the STABLE branch was that close to > applying. Just an update to the above, I was planning on getting to this sooner but currently have higher ordered tasks to accomplish first. If I do happen to get around to it I will put a patchset up somewhere for trial. You should be advised that if this does happen and you upgrade your pool + kernel there is a possibility that 8-STABLE will never see these changes officially so you will be left to your own demise or to upgrade to a 9-CURRENT system in order to have a supported source tree with the zfsv28 patch once that gets in there. With the above 'stated', this is why it has not been my highest priority right now. Regards, - -- jhell,v -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMiqIYAAoJEJBXh4mJ2FR+dbwH/2l0tUg0TbJrwxJOhEbZmCez kviw4TLRugd3EX/c/Gs3PFlJPaN7dK8PFMpdt3P8ule0Vd/5+b0tAzdiwP58p1g9 AcELf1N83hhwunkVPp5OYW7+dUP7ujhz/tGCdZkKVF3VHx+Tmp4oK3PY6p9yXZuO XZwbSYVq8SeJoZAANbO1/OTQxnCB/N7mCnW4pR09IUnHB4HiYuEuzgkjbWvFbbKR 2yAxLl5JwkKy9maK2E3DVS6icv3DiSGp42s6dp4faSnFbgQrJNpd9LcUbJNiiC0a r+uVgYvo4Wgj8z354CFnXpEct+LKBtXj04ufhzcyvpSoMKm9L1U3u41FeMEwWsE= =AZRS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C8AA218.8090104>