From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Jan 4 19:17:55 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1698637B401 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2003 19:17:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551F343EC5 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2003 19:17:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA15369; Sat, 4 Jan 2003 20:17:46 -0700 (MST) X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook renders your system susceptible to Internet worms. Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20030104201251.029387d0@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 20:15:06 -0700 To: Rahul Siddharthan From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Bystander shot by a spam filter Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20030104182558.A11809@papagena.rockefeller.edu> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030104112015.026a5530@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 04:25 PM 1/4/2003, Rahul Siddharthan wrote: >GCC 3.2.1 seems to perform around as well, on my code, as Intel's >compiler. Depends on your code. A program consisting mostly of function calls isn't going to be much of a challenge for any compiler. But try some serious nested loops, or floating point, and GCC generates about the most naive code you could imagine. You could do better dashing it off in assembly language. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message