From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 16:15:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC46416A4B3 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 16:15:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC7243FB1 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 16:15:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from damian@sentex.net) Received: from pegmatite.sentex.ca (pegmatite.sentex.ca [192.168.42.92]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h97NFg7m075486 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 19:15:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from damian@sentex.net) Received: by pegmatite.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7695B17154; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 19:15:36 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 19:15:36 -0400 From: Damian Gerow To: java@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031007231536.GW15256@sentex.net> References: <3F834776.5020108@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F834776.5020108@acm.org> X-GPG-Key-Id: 0xB841F142 X-GPG-Fingerprint: C7C1 E1D1 EC06 7C86 AF7C 57E6 173D 9CF6 B841 F142 X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: Re: Native jdk1.4.1 working X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 23:15:43 -0000 Thus spake Andrew Houghton (aah@acm.org) [07/10/03 19:08]: > I'm not whining -- from posts in the past few months, it seems like > significant work is still occurring. It would just be nice to have that > process be a little more transparent. Erm... I think you mean either a little more /ap/parent, or a little /less/ transparent. I've been waiting for a 'no need to apply patches manually' build of 1.4 on -CURRENT for a while now. It's not urgent, and I've plenty of patience, I just haven't had the time to chase down the various patches that have been posted to the mailing list that would let it compile. I, as well, would like to see the various mailing list patches folded into the official patchset. Heck, even the experimental patchset would do -- it's relatively easy to modify the port to use it.