Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:10:04 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/lib/libreadline/readline Makefile Message-ID: <20041018091004.GC86525@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20041018090550.GA59302@nagual.pp.ru> References: <200410180836.i9I8afRS060144@repoman.freebsd.org> <20041018090314.GA86525@ip.net.ua> <20041018090550.GA59302@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--PuGuTyElPB9bOcsM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 01:05:51PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 12:03:14PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > Why a backout? Unless you make a real termcap library, > > this is just pointless -- we've discussed this already, > > and we should all know that what gets recorded as a real > > dependency in a binary is still spelled "libncurses.so". >=20 > See private mail. Real dependency unchanged after back out: >=20 > /lib/libreadline.so.5: > libncurses.so.5 =3D> /lib/libncurses.so.5 (0x2819a000) >=20 Yes, real dependency recorded in binaries is for libncurses, and that was a reason that DPADD and LDADD were changed to point to libncurses. So, what was the reason for backing this out? Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --PuGuTyElPB9bOcsM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBc4hsqRfpzJluFF4RAp9WAJ9tqj1gqqiY3eN9FpFREFm8jFe2zgCggdHx wOynxX/8c9FzUtn07w9AJo8= =69Xw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PuGuTyElPB9bOcsM--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041018091004.GC86525>