From owner-freebsd-security Fri Apr 13 10:55:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from ra.upan.org (ra.upan.org [204.107.76.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2C137B423 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 10:55:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mikel@ocsinternet.com) Received: from ocsinternet.com (thoth.upan.org [204.107.76.16]) by ra.upan.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f3DHshZ78904; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 13:54:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mikel@ocsinternet.com) Message-ID: <3AD73F73.FFD68B93@ocsinternet.com> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 14:03:31 -0400 From: Mikel X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en,it MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roger Marquis Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Security Announcements & Incremental Patches References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Roger Marquis wrote: > [SNIP] > > Your agenda is showing Wes. The market share of production various > systems is pretty obvious to those who spend any amount of time in > Silicon Valley datacenters. It's surey as obvious to those of use walking round Silicon Alley Datacenters (NYC). My systems alway sport the lastest in 'Darby' screen saver fashion. I'm patiently awaiting the summer line now...;) I do see quite a bit of BSD and Linux servers out there, and if one were to count F5, Nokia, and Juniper on the BSD side as the majority of these manufacturers have systems based on BSD then the numbers are greater than you can imagine. On a side note I had heard somewhere that Alteon Loadbalancers are BSD based as well, any truth to the rumor? Cheers, Mikel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message