Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 17:39:56 -0700 (PDT) From: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.org> To: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk> Cc: Stephen McKay <syssgm@detir.qld.gov.au>, Peter Jeremy <jeremyp@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Softupdates reliability? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908241738490.48697-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <550.199908242209@doyle.cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Richard Tobin wrote:
> > > Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x580 Stepping=0
>
> > You have one of the first K6-2s off the line. There were definite problems
> > with these, and as such, they were specially distinguished by having 66
> > printed on top.
>
> I have a 0x580 which has had no problems at all. I'm pretty certain
> it doesn't have 66 stamped on it. Are they all supposed to have this,
> or were they tested and the dodgy ones stamped 66?
It must be the latter. My 0x580 had the 66, so it must be that the dodgy
ones got labelled 66 and not all the 0x580s were defective.
>
> -- Richard
>
--
Brian Fundakowski Feldman / "Any sufficiently advanced bug is \
green@FreeBSD.org | indistinguishable from a feature." |
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! \ -- Rich Kulawiec /
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9908241738490.48697-100000>