From owner-cvs-all Mon Jan 25 21:27:56 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA03931 for cvs-all-outgoing; Mon, 25 Jan 1999 21:27:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles37.castles.com [208.214.165.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA03914; Mon, 25 Jan 1999 21:27:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA14408; Mon, 25 Jan 1999 21:24:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199901260524.VAA14408@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Matthew Dillon cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 'cpdup' program, and question In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 25 Jan 1999 20:52:10 PST." <199901260452.UAA12753@apollo.backplane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 21:24:06 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > I would like to commit it. Should it be a port or should I commit it to > /usr/bin or even /bin? The only reason why I ask is that I think the > program could be very useful in handling diskless workstation startup > as well as templating, and the program can also be extremely useful in > single-user mode when recovering a system over an NFS mount because, unlike > tar or cpio, you can ^C it and start it over again without wasting all the > work that has already been accomplished. This would argue for /bin. It should be a port. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message