Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 12 Oct 1995 02:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com>
To:        olsenc@smokey.ee.washington.edu (Clint Olsen)
Cc:        hardware@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: SCSI_DELAY
Message-ID:  <199510120911.CAA04673@ref.tfs.com>
In-Reply-To: <199510120749.AAA00197@smokey.ee.washington.edu> from "Clint Olsen" at Oct 12, 95 00:49:25 am

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
> 
> It was suggested that I increase SCSI_DELAY.  As I suspected, it
> didn't have any effect.  I changed it from 10 to 20 seconds.  I
> doubt an eon would have any difference:
> 
> aic0 at 0x340-0x35f irq 11 on isa
> aic0 waiting for scsi devices to settle
> (aic0:1:0): "CDC 94171-9 0045" type 0 fixed SCSI 1
> sd0(aic0:1:0): Direct-Access 312MB (640584 512 byte sectors)
> (aic0:2:0): "unknown unknown ????" type 0 fixed SCSI 0
Well it's seeing the device..
but the resulting data isn't standard...  so it doesn't know the type
is this a REALLY OLD device? (like maybe SASI not even SCSI?)

can you show that identify data again?
I'll look at it better next time.. i promise..


> 
> However, using scsi(8) commands does properly identify the second
> disk.  Could the aic driver be at fault?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Clint
> 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510120911.CAA04673>