From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Nov 19 20:56:53 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383C716A4CE
	for <freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:56:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lakemtao08.cox.net (lakemtao08.cox.net [68.1.17.113])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031C044022
	for <freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:56:47 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mezz7@cox.net)
Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.32.11]) by lakemtao08.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP
          id <20031120045644.OHQR5790.lakemtao08.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com>;
          Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:56:44 -0500
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 22:55:52 -0600
To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
References: <opryv52asf8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net>
	<3FBB95BB.2090105@webonaut.com> <opryv7g9p48ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net>
	<3FBB9CD2.4070201@webonaut.com> <opryv9mu0j8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net>
	<opryv9s1gb8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> <3FBBA862.3070008@webonaut.com>
	<oprywbmdss8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> <3FBBBBA6.5010301@webonaut.com>
	<oprywh92mh8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net>
	<20031119212505.GQ40706@toxic.magnesium.net>
	<20031119230406.001541f1.Alexander@Leidinger.net>
From: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <opryw6newg8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20031119230406.001541f1.Alexander@Leidinger.net>
User-Agent: Opera7.21/Linux M2 build 497
cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: need your opinion/vote for name of gdesklets...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining
	<freebsd-gnome.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
	<mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
	<mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 04:56:53 -0000

On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 23:04:06 +0100, Alexander Leidinger 
<Alexander@Leidinger.net> wrote:

> On 19 Nov 2003 16:25:05 -0500
> Adam Weinberger <adamw@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>> > 1)
>> > gdesklets-<name>-sensor
>> > gdesklets-<name>-display
>> >
>> > 2)
>> > gdesklets-sensor-<name>
>> > gdesklets-display-<name>
>> >
>> > Which is better? 1 or 2? Vote....
>
>
>> I like 2 better. That way, I can easily search for gdesklets sensors by
>> doing locate gdesklets-sensor-.
>
> That's a very good reason...

I agree, #2 is already a winner.

> What's the gdesklet syntax for referring to sensors/displays? Do we want
> to change it if it isn't 2)?

I am not sure, but I prefer to add 'gdesklets-' for ease to search. In 
gentoo, they do desklet-<name>display and desklet-<name>sensor, no space 
between. In Debian, they put all stuff together in a package and name it 
as gdesklets-data.

I personal think I will go for #2 above.

Cheers,
Mezz

> Bye,
> Alexander.


-- 
bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.