Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:46:19 -0400
From:      "Yarema" <yds@ingress.net>
To:        "Palle Girgensohn" <girgen@partitur.se>, "Jun Kuriyama" <kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp>
Cc:        "Ports Team" <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: mod_jserv for apache
Message-ID:  <00c001bec320$75c44780$1f40e6cd@ingress.com>
References:  <37758822.C4BEC2D@sky.rim.or.jp> <3776A5B5.CA6E9DBF@partitur.se>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Palle Girgensohn <girgen@partitur.se>
> Jun Kuriyama wrote:
> >
> > I'm ready to import a port of jserv DSO for apache.  This port doesn't
> > include apache core modules, only jserv's DSO and documents.
> >
> > What should we choose PKGNAME for it?
>
>
> NetBSD has had DSO ports for some time, and they use ap-xxx, alas
> ap-jserv in this case. But. NetBSD is traditionally less verbose. How
> about 'apache-jserv'. I know that there is work going on to move most of
> the apache modules to dso, so this will not confuse in the long run.

I think 'apache-jserv' might be confused with 'apache13-mod_ssl' and the
like, which are fullblown apache installations not just DSO modules. Since
perl modules use p5- and python modules use py- I think using ap- for apache
modules would be more consistent.

--
Yarema



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00c001bec320$75c44780$1f40e6cd>