Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 24 Nov 1998 10:48:27 -0800 (PST)
From:      John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
To:        Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Is fsck broken for autoboot?
Message-ID:  <XFMail.981124104827.jdp@polstra.com>
In-Reply-To: <199811241840.KAA24530@mango.parc.xerox.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24-Nov-98 Bill Fenner wrote:
> I don't know when -stable switched to real slices, but I was experiencing
> this problem when I was booting a mix of 2.2.2 (required compatibility
> slice) and 2.2.6 (required real slice) kernels on the same machine - if I
> put the "compatible" device in fstab, the 2.2.6 kernel would fail to mount
> / if fsck had to fix it.

My -stable machine is fairly recent, so it should be OK to change it.  Thanks
for the advice.

More evidence: a different -stable machine came back up fine.  I just checked,
and it does not use the compatibility slice.

On the failing -current machine, I may be stuck.  For work-related reasons, I
sometimes have to run an older kernel which requires the compatibility slice on
that machine.  I guess I could set it up with a separate root partition for the
old kernel.

John
---
  John Polstra                                               jdp@polstra.com
  John D. Polstra & Co., Inc.                        Seattle, Washington USA
  "Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public."
                                                            -- H. L. Mencken


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.981124104827.jdp>