From owner-freebsd-mobile Sun Oct 1 7: 1:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from lavender.sanpei.org (ppp128.dialup.st.keio.ac.jp [131.113.27.128]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9041137B66D for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 07:01:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from sanpei@localhost) by lavender.sanpei.org (8.11.0/3.7W) id e91DqBK01139; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 22:52:11 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200010011352.e91DqBK01139@lavender.sanpei.org> To: imp@village.org Cc: sean@stat.Duke.EDU, mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [pcic irq] May I change default pcic mode into polling? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 30 Sep 2000 21:36:10 -0600" References: <200010010336.VAA15019@harmony.village.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.70 on Emacs 19.34.1 / Mule 2.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 22:52:11 +0900 From: MIHIRA@sanpei.org, Sanpei Yoshiro Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >In message <20000930223608.A8104@stat.Duke.EDU> "Sean O'Connell" writes: >: Could we get rid of the pcic1 as well? Or maybe move it into LINT >: as an example? I think it is just confusing otherwise. > >I agree. I think that it is a holdover from when this was needed for >PAO. I agree that it is confusing. Also, PnP causes us to come up as >pcic2 on my laptop. Not that this is a big deal to me, and it might >just be a silly thing I've done on my laptop. I agree that pcic1 also is changed to polling mode. But I will ask in Japanese mobile mailing list, whether pcic1 would be remove from GENERIC config or not. Cheers --- MIHIRA, Sanpei Yoshiro Yokohama, Japan. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message