Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:36:20 +0100
From:      Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...
Message-ID:  <23506402.20050212033620@wanadoo.fr>
In-Reply-To: <420D669A.20000@incubus.de>
References:  <9C4E897FB284BF4DBC9C0DC42FB34617641AE6@mvaexch01.acuson.com> <420D669A.20000@incubus.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthias Buelow writes:

> MacOS X is the "Desktop BSD".  It is available today, and it works
> better than anything else at being a "desktop".  Considering the sorry
> state of integrated "desktops" on Unix today (i.e., Gnome and KDE) and
> compare it with Windows, do you really think that will convince any 
> Windows user?  Windows really is bad enough already, why should they 
> change for a much worse user interface.  For those of us that have been
> using X11 with various window managers for the last decade or more, that
> isn't an issue -- we're used to a different way of working, but those 
> Windows types expect quite different things, which they'll only find in
> MacOS, outside of Windows, for the forseeable future.

Yes!

So it's best to forget the battles one has lost, and concentrate on the
battles that one can still win.

-- 
Anthony




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?23506402.20050212033620>