Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 10:59:55 -0700 From: "Charles Burns" <burnscharlesn@hotmail.com> To: katinka@magestower.com, tedm@toybox.placo.com, bzdik@yahoo.com, vince@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET, lplist@closedsrc.org Cc: jgowdy@home.com, kris@obsecurity.org, mwlist@lanfear.com, freebsd@sysmach.com, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: the AMD factor in FreeBSD Message-ID: <F189ltcNdbUu2o8q3p9000009ad@hotmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>while we are talking on comparing different cpu classes what about sun >spark >stations or SG boxes ???? > >I may have a cpu that can do 20mips, but was not designed to run an os >(like embedded micro controllers they run one program for ever) FreeBSD doesn't run on those yet AFAIK. >PS how did apple compare the adobe Photoshop ?? as I recall the only thing >common was the screen layout, other than that the code was completely >different. has anyone written a "C" program that is then cross compiled on >multiple platforms ????? I know this is not a real "office program" test, >but atleast would compare the functions of the cups Some of the parts of PS that Apple touted were assembly optimized for the G4. Kinda shady if you ask me. ;-) (The G4 really is faster at a given clockspeed though) _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F189ltcNdbUu2o8q3p9000009ad>