Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:30:41 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        "Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steve@sohara.org>
Cc:        Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Best file system for a busy webserver
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208170629350.31628@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <20120816214230.0f4fb446.steve@sohara.org>
References:  <47AFB706686083E99B3A3F3E@localhost> <20120816180257.6f5d58e5.steve@sohara.org> <175D3B4E21331C5682EE2148@localhost> <20120816214230.0f4fb446.steve@sohara.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
> 	OK I would say there's no pressing reason to consider ZFS for this

another ZFS fanatics. it is about performance.

> direction for a filesystem, at 15GB if performance ever becomes a problem a
> RAID1 of SSDs with UFS would make it fly probably into the hundreds of hits
> per second range.
classic for ZFS and "modern things" fanatics. lots of talk about high end 
hardware nothing about a thread.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1208170629350.31628>