From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 19 13:13:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F2816A4CE; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 13:13:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from server1.ultratrends.com (server1.ultratrends.com [205.206.59.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A985843D41; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 13:13:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trodat@ultratrends.com) Received: from server1.ultratrends.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i8JCDrnH005889; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 06:13:53 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from trodat@ultratrends.com) Received: from localhost (trodat@localhost)i8JCDr1B005886; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 06:13:53 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from trodat@ultratrends.com) X-Authentication-Warning: server1.ultratrends.com: trodat owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 06:13:53 -0600 (MDT) From: Technical Director To: timh@tjhawkins.com In-Reply-To: <010e01c49df0$a5b79400$6401a8c0@yourw92p4bhlzg> Message-ID: <20040919055918.A5844@server1.ultratrends.com> References: <010801c49dee$72cc5eb0$6401a8c0@yourw92p4bhlzg> <010e01c49df0$a5b79400$6401a8c0@yourw92p4bhlzg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please explain. (What is HawkinsOS?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 13:13:55 -0000 Err, maybe you should use ... HawkinsOS??? T.J.HAWKINS Secure, Stable, Supported Operating System... I really enjoyed that. Maybe this inquiry is to get the developers to work out HawkinsOS, whatever version of FreeBSD you sed'd s/FreeBSD/HawkinsOS/g, problems with multi-threading? My troll addition. PS Your site says you are a Programmer, providing proof of concepts for what you are discussing shouldn't be to hard. *** On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 timh@tjhawkins.com wrote: > Your taking it the wrong way, I was simply asking a question to the > developers to confirm this. > > I have standardized on FreeBSD. > > I apologized if I made it seem like I was trolling, not my intention. > > If a business were to standardize on FreeBSD, they would love to know if the > multithreading issues would be fixed completely correctly not just > 'work-arounds'. > > > sorry and thanks > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Laverdure" > To: > Cc: ; ; > > Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 5:22 PM > Subject: Re: Please explain. > > > > On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 02:14, timh@tjhawkins.com wrote: > > > Ask the FreeBSD developers, any of them with honesty should tell you or > > > proof me false. I dare you to proof this false, I would be so happy if > you > > > did. Just because I'm using MS Mailer does not reflect whom I am. I have > > > only 1 MS workstation with 9 others unix. > > > > > > I expected a mature response from most of you, calling names is NOT the > way > > > to resolve problems. I just want an answer to see if this is true. > > > > > > **Is it true**? This is what I've noticed myself and many high-scale > > > developers. > > > > > > Thank you > > > > 1) The burden of proof is on the person making the allegations. > > > > 2) Calling a troll on being a troll is mature. > > > > 3) If you believe it to be true, then don't use FreeBSD. Nobody is tying > > your hands here. You believe DragonFlyBSD to be superior? Then use it. > > > > Maybe I just don't see the big deal here, but the developers owe you > > nothing. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >