From owner-freebsd-current Sat Feb 1 09:12:49 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA00348 for current-outgoing; Sat, 1 Feb 1997 09:12:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from plaut.de (inet.plaut.de [194.39.177.166]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA00329 for ; Sat, 1 Feb 1997 09:12:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from totum.plaut.de (totum.plaut.de [194.39.177.9]) by plaut.de (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id SAA18779; Sat, 1 Feb 1997 18:12:34 +0100 Received: from localhost (root@localhost) by totum.plaut.de (8.8.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA01075; Sat, 1 Feb 1997 18:12:34 +0100 (MET) Date: Sat, 1 Feb 1997 18:12:34 +0100 (MET) From: Michael Reifenberger To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: FreeBSD-current users , Joerg Wunsch Subject: Re: Good name for a dump(8) option? In-Reply-To: <19234.854813398@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, 1 Feb 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > Date: Sat, 01 Feb 1997 08:09:58 -0800 > From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" > To: Joerg Wunsch > Cc: FreeBSD-current users > Subject: Re: Good name for a dump(8) option? > > > How to name this kid? Right now, i've picked key `e' (``end of > > medium'', ``enforce end-of-medium''), lacking a better idea. Are > > there any better suggestions that don't conflict with other existing > > keys? > > How about a tape length of -1 for the existing option? :-) Wouldn't the -1 cause YetAnotherOption? Should't it be a size of 0 instead? Bye! ---- Michael Reifenberger Plaut Software GmbH, R/3 Basis