Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 11:30:51 +0200 (EET) From: Andrew Stesin <stesin@gu.net> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: LFS is nuked? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980202112849.17354B-100000@beast.gu.net> In-Reply-To: <199801310108.UAA23804@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 30 Jan 1998, Garrett Wollman wrote: > > Of course, we all know that once something is in the attic, it's > > bound to be studiosly attended to, just like the XNS, ISO, and > > X.25 code have all been fixed... > > But unlike XNS, ISO-CLNS, and X.25, LFS might actually be of value to > real users. LFS _is_ of value, unionfs also is, and X.25 also is for someone... Best regards, Andrew Stesin nic-hdl: ST73-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980202112849.17354B-100000>