From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Feb  2 01:31:20 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA02816
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 2 Feb 1998 01:31:20 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from beast.gu.net (beast.gu.net [194.93.190.196])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA02810
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 2 Feb 1998 01:31:16 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from stesin@gu.net)
Received: from localhost (localhost.gu.kiev.ua [127.0.0.1]) by beast.gu.net (8.8.7/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA17457; Mon, 2 Feb 1998 11:30:52 +0200 (EET)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 11:30:51 +0200 (EET)
From: Andrew Stesin <stesin@gu.net>
Reply-To: stesin@gu.net
To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: LFS is nuked?
In-Reply-To: <199801310108.UAA23804@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980202112849.17354B-100000@beast.gu.net>
X-NCC-RegID: ua.gu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG
X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe current"

On Fri, 30 Jan 1998, Garrett Wollman wrote:

> > Of course, we all know that once something is in the attic, it's
> > bound to be studiosly attended to, just like the XNS, ISO, and
> > X.25 code have all been fixed...
> 
> But unlike XNS, ISO-CLNS, and X.25, LFS might actually be of value to
> real users.

	LFS _is_ of value, unionfs also is, and X.25 also is for someone...

Best regards,
Andrew Stesin

nic-hdl: ST73-RIPE