Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 06:39:31 -0500 From: "Allen Smith" <easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Studded <Studded@gorean.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, andreas@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is 'xntpd' broken in -stable? Message-ID: <9902110639.ZM19743@beatrice.rutgers.edu> In-Reply-To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> "Re: Is 'xntpd' broken in -stable?" (Feb 11, 2:39am) References: <24995.918719168@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 11, 2:39am, Poul-Henning Kamp (possibly) wrote: > In message <9902110212.ZM18803@beatrice.rutgers.edu>, "Allen Smith" writes: > > >I'll look at doing so... but might Poul Henning-Kamp be a more logical > >individual for this? > > ENOTIME Fully understood. Andreas may be a better nominee for this (making ntp 4.x the contrib'd version for 3.-stable), since he's the one currently maintaining the ntp 4.0.91 port. BTW, ntp 4 includes a couple of line disciplines designed for use by ntpd. Have any of you taken a look at adding these to FreeBSD, particularly the tty_clk one (the tty_chu one being of much more limited usage)? -Allen -- Allen Smith easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9902110639.ZM19743>