From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 11 03:53:42 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA02614 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Thu, 11 Feb 1999 03:53:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from beatrice.rutgers.edu (beatrice.rutgers.edu [165.230.209.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA02608; Thu, 11 Feb 1999 03:53:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu) Received: (from easmith@localhost) by beatrice.rutgers.edu (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id GAA19745; Thu, 11 Feb 1999 06:39:31 -0500 (EST) From: "Allen Smith" Message-Id: <9902110639.ZM19743@beatrice.rutgers.edu> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 06:39:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: Poul-Henning Kamp "Re: Is 'xntpd' broken in -stable?" (Feb 11, 2:39am) References: <24995.918719168@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail) To: Poul-Henning Kamp Subject: Re: Is 'xntpd' broken in -stable? Cc: Studded , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, andreas@FreeBSD.ORG Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Feb 11, 2:39am, Poul-Henning Kamp (possibly) wrote: > In message <9902110212.ZM18803@beatrice.rutgers.edu>, "Allen Smith" writes: > > >I'll look at doing so... but might Poul Henning-Kamp be a more logical > >individual for this? > > ENOTIME Fully understood. Andreas may be a better nominee for this (making ntp 4.x the contrib'd version for 3.-stable), since he's the one currently maintaining the ntp 4.0.91 port. BTW, ntp 4 includes a couple of line disciplines designed for use by ntpd. Have any of you taken a look at adding these to FreeBSD, particularly the tty_clk one (the tty_chu one being of much more limited usage)? -Allen -- Allen Smith easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message